Tne Risk Of Implementing A New Technology In A Mobile Phones Company

IntroductionIn the 1940s mobile phone technology underwent several changes which tolerated ameliorate services to the people and r maturationized confabulation due to the apprehension of mobility in communications , which has enabled the users to talk and listen even temporary hookup traveling or on the move . At render much than 50 of the people are connected by means of cellular phonesIn the year 1940 the radiotelephone service was launched in the US in to connect the users in cars by connecting to a domain resolute network . In the 1960s Bell Systems introduced the IMTS or alter Mobile Telephone Service , which offered higher bandwidth and send off dialing this was the institution for the analog systems develop in 1970s The reportage areas were explode into smaller areas called `cells em violenceed by a first gea r power transreceiver . Then came the First Generation or 1G communication on analog system with the development of microprocessors and the control amourage was digitized amongst the transmitter and the mobile phone . The Second generation or 2G digitized cellular systems started in 1980 . The digitization , which included the control link as well as the voice signal helped to provide cleanse quality reception at lower cost . In to meet the need for voice fax and the lucre on the cell phones with global roaming , the ITU s IMT- 2000 global archetype for 3G or 3rd generation technology was implemented , it includes multimedia delight , docudrama and location based servicesImplementing 3G technology poses many hurdle in terms of the services provided , the specimen to be adopt in reaching 3G , the time factor and the cost strong maneuver . An examination of the results of the 2G technology in general and that of the GSM technology in particular is imperative before impl ementing of the 3G technology . The success ! of GSM in the mobile field is attributable to the ontogeny of the 2G systemsThe 3G system is developed from the outcomes of the 2G systems or because the operators deploying them must influence pre-established 2G infrastructure or node bases .

These two factors are interlinked so examining one implies looking at the successes or weaknesses of the otherEuropean telecom markets were controlled by content governments prior to the globalization of markets in the 1990s . Since then European telecommunications policy had been characterized by principles of market liberalization , harmonization of conditions of the regu latory framework and the promotion of the European telecommunication industry . The GSM was a product of this travail . It is the leading 2G system having pan-European coverage and systems are also installed in Asia , Australia North America and South America . The European discipline companies have standardized the system of GSM and the working process is a great success . The companies then realized , first the advantages of the cross-boarder standard and second , the amount of money and energy that would be penniless in its absence when competing for mobile technology world bidding . The course of digital technology and its commercial applications influences the establishment of GSM . In other words control over network evolution translates into...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper