“Good Will Hunting”: Cognitive Dissonance Essay

lead Hunting, played by monotonic Damon, in the movie Good willing Hunting is the epitome of a psychological paradigm. He slew be examine in so many ways, touching on many of the different fields of psychology. The intimately interesting thing about Will is the cognitive dissonance he goes through throughout the film. He is torn between these two cognitions, both of which contradict each other. One of these cognitions is the fact that he is an orphan from randomness Boston, meaning he should only have a low right job and live there for the rest of his life. It would be wrong of him to freeze about his roots and try to become close tothing of himself, which would be unfair to his familiaritys who arent as blessed as Will. On the other hand, he is a profoundly smart individually to such a degree that Prof. Gerald Lambeau compares him to Einstein. He knows he has potential to get out of South Boston and possibly do many great things with his superior lore, exclusively he m akes himself count he doesnt want to because of this other cognition. This cognitive dissonance he bares is the unmatchable main thing that keeps him from making a concrete finding of moving on to be something better.His perception is also something spectacular to ensure at, especially from a psychological approach. Although he has a much high intelligence than others, the intelligence he has is concentrated on only one aspect of intelligence. His Componential intelligence is so over developed that it possibly caused the underdevelopment of his contextual intelligence and emotional intelligence. His Componential intelligence is obviously much higher than others, which is seen when he works these complex math equations with such ease. His lack of Contextual intelligence is made very clear by Sean Maguire, his psychologist, played by robin Williams. In one particular scene, Sean breaks down Will by stating that each response Will has to anything comes from a book.None of his re sponses come from real domain experiences and therefore he has no real knowledge of the things you just cant learn from books, such as love. One example is when Will speaks about Seans wife, he obviously had no knowledge of the discommode or suffering Sean went through, but acted as if he did because he analyzed a painting Sean did. He is also lacking emotional intelligence substantially, which is shown regularly throughout the film. The scarcity of this part of his intelligence is possibly callable to the fact he was beaten numerous of times as a child. This caused his intelligence to possibly becoming immature in some separate and highly established in others. An example of this is evident throughout some all the scenes with his somewhat girlfriend Skylar, played by Minnie Driver. He doesnt quite know how to deal with relationships, mainly because he is lacking in this part of his intelligence, especially those relationships with the opposite sex.Through numerous of sessio ns with Sean and the aide of Skylar and his friend Chuckie, Will begins to confront this Cognitive dissonance. Not only does he introduce that he indeed has a gift that needs to be utilized, but he also confronts this emotional intelligence deficiency by maturing it a bit and realizing that its not always bad to let somebody inside and discover who you really are. By the end of the story Will has matured vastly in all aspects of Cognition. His emotional intelligence has change magnitude greatly along with his Contextual intelligence. He also has found some Cognitive Consistency, which is what many people long for, especially those with extreme cognitive dissonance such as Will did.